Silver City Antiques

Silver City Antiques Architectural salvage anything old in need of restoration bought. Items of local historic interest, anything Scottish very desirable.

08/01/2026

It's alarming that the United States, under the current administration, appears to be intervening in the affairs of a sovereign nation, Venezuela, under the guise of helping its people. The reality, however, is far less altruistic. The move is widely perceived as a grab for power and control of oil resources.
This cynical approach is mirrored in the administration’s overt friendliness with President Putin, suggesting that both leaders are “cut from the same cloth” when it comes to disregarding global norms. Equally troubling is the silence of the UK Labour leader, Keir Starmer, who has offered neither criticism nor defence of international law in this context. His muted response raises questions about the United Kingdom’s commitment to upholding the rule of law that we have long championed. Brexit was sold to the British public as a restoration of parliamentary sovereignty. Instead, it has delivered a new form of dependency. Outside the European Union, the UK no longer benefits from collective legal frameworks or the restraint they provide. The “special relationship” with the United States now seems one sided, when America openly disregards international rules, while Britain looked the other way. This abdication of responsibility is felt most acutely in Scotland, which remains shackled to a UK that tips its cap to Washington out of fear of an unpredictable US president. The British state has been mismanaged for years, and Brexit has only made things much worse. Scotland finds itself in a predicament. Where does that leave us? It leaves a nation yearning for genuine sovereignty, accountable leadership, and a foreign policy that reflects the values of law, fairness, and mutual respect. We need independence now.

20/12/2025

I am writing to draw attention to the contrasting outcomes of North‑Sea oil revenues for Scotland and Norway and to the impact this has had on Scotland’s fiscal capacity and the prospects of future generations. When commercial oil production began in the early 1970s, both Scotland and Norway possessed comparable offshore resources. Norway chose to channel the bulk of its revenues into a sovereign‑wealth fund, the Government Pension Fund Global, which now exceeds one trillion dollars. The fund’s purpose is to smooth public expenditure, invest for the long term and preserve wealth for future citizens. As a result, Norway has been able to maintain low public debt, invest in education, health and infrastructure, and provide a substantial fiscal buffer against economic shocks. In contrast, the United Kingdom’s fiscal framework placed North‑Sea oil revenues within the central UK Treasury. While Scotland contributed an estimated £30 billion to the UK exchequer between 1975 and 2005, the corresponding share of the proceeds was not earmarked for Scottish public investment. Instead, the revenue was absorbed into general UK spending, leaving Scotland with limited capital to build a comparable fund or to address the social and economic challenges that accompanied deindustrialisation. The consequences are evident in Westminster's higher public debt and the need for continued borrowing to fund essential services. Younger Scots face a future where the wealth generated by their natural resources has been largely diverted, limiting the capacity to invest in sustainable development, housing and climate transition. I respectfully request that the UK government return North‑Sea revenues to Scotland, with a view to establishing a dedicated Scottish fund modelled on Norway’s successful approach. Such a measure would help restore fiscal autonomy, safeguard public services and ensure that the legacy of Scotland’s oil wealth benefits current and future generations.

15/11/2025

The donkeys are always such a big help 🤣

06/11/2025

Alister Jack, in his role as the UK Government’s colonial master in Scotland, surely did not realise the consequences of puting a halt to the Scottish Government's shovel ready bottle return scheme. If he had, surely he would not have done what he did, allowing Biffa Waste Services to sue the Scottish Government for £166 million of reparations over the decision to delay the return scheme, so that the UK government could catch up. As Jack's decision caused this law suit and as Jack was in the employ of the UK government, it is the UK government Biffa should be seeking reparations from. Jack's higher up politicians should also have realised this and allowed the Scottish government to proceed with the return scheme instead of making Jack a Lord for his incompetence. Perhaps they thought that undermining the Scottish government was a good idea.

05/11/2025

The GERS figures were designed in such a way to maximise the appearance of Scottish financial dependency on the good graces of the Westminster Treasury and Lang wanted some political ammunition to counter the movement for a Scottish Parliament which was gaining momentum in the 90s when it was still fondly hoped by its advocates that the Labour and Lib Dem parties would not water down proposals for a Scottish Parliament with a wide range of tax raising and borrowing powers and full control over energy policy and broadcasting. Spoiler alert, Labour shafted us.

31/10/2025

INDEPENDENCE sometimes felt like a tough sell when I was first elected to the Scottish Parliament in 2003. Many Scots hadn’t yet considered it a serious proposition, and even many of those who felt the attraction dismissed it as a bit of a romantic dream. What a journey we have been on since those days.

During my time as an MSP, and having had the opportunity to play my part in advocating for Scottish self-determination, I have seen the independence cause grow from a distant aspiration to a solid, viable proposition that more and more Scots see as not only attractive, but achievable.

Just last week, polling showed an impressive double-digit lead for Yes. And frankly, I’m not surprised. The people of Scotland have been forced to endure years of austerity budgets from Westminster.

We’ve been left to clear up the mess caused by some disastrous policy mistakes to keep people from poverty and harm. And now, we’re being faced with the very real threat of Nigel Farage being handed the Downing Street keys in a few years.

So independence feels ever more urgent. The stakes are getting higher. But despite this, the independence movement is too often bogged down in endless discussions on strategy and process, with the fruitless search for a trick or shortcut that simply doesn’t exist.

Independence won’t be delivered by that kind of magical thinking. Of course, it won’t be delivered by just waiting and hoping either.

If we want to see independence turn from a tantalisingly achievable aspiration into a reality, we still have to give the people of Scotland a belief in the kind of country we would build if we had the power.

We have to take Scotland with us. Every year, more people who voted No in 2014 come round to Yes, and more young people reach voting age with a belief in Scotland’s future. This is the task we need to continue.

Scotland is a devastatingly unequal country. A tiny number of people sit on more wealth than they could spend in 1000 lifetimes. The five richest families in Scotland are estimated to have more wealth than the Scottish Government collected in income tax last year.

There’s huge support for a wealth tax in Scotland. And while many of the powers to deliver this sit with the UK Government, the Scottish Government can tax property and land – where a vast amount of wealth in our country is hoarded.

Yet Scottish Government ministers have passed up opportunities to tax wealth with the powers they already have, doing little more than tinkering at the edges. They rejected Green proposals to end tax breaks for big landowners, to end the king’s personal tax exemptions, and even proposals to introduce a tax on mansions.

Supporting something “in principle” and then refusing to take action doesn’t cut it.

It doesn’t raise revenue or tackle inequality – but it also doesn’t tell the people of Scotland that we have the courage of our convictions.

Westminster is a drag on Scotland, but it can’t stop us completely. If anything, it should force us to be braver and bolder with the powers we do hold. The constraints we face should leave us determined to do everything we can to improve the lives of people in Scotland, and dare the UK Government to challenge us.

Sometimes, it’ll mean having a proper row. But too often, the SNP back away from that fight. The Scottish Greens will always stand up for a Scotland where the wealthiest people start paying their fair share.

Where our public services are properly funded and workers aren’t run into the ground. Where our public transport is brought back into public ownership, preventing the millionaires who own our privatised bus companies from cashing in on rubbish services.

Where big polluters pay for the damage they’ve done to our natural world, instead of getting away with doing more.

Every day, we fight to show people what a greener, fairer independent Scotland could be. Public services built for people, not profit; climate policy built for people and the planet, not for corporate interests.

Independence isn’t about self-preservation for one party, and it’s not just about nationhood for its own sake either.

Independence for a purpose means building a movement rooted in shared values and a bold plan to change people’s lives here in Scotland, and to show responsibility in the face of global challenges too.

That is why a vote for the Scottish Greens at next year’s election really matters. A strong Green presence in Parliament ensures that independence is about transforming society, not simply transferring power from Westminster to Holyrood.

It’s the surest way to deliver a strong pro-independence majority, and it will mean that a vision of independence is accompanied by the bold action right now that will convince more people that our country’s on the right path.

We believe that independence can give Scotland a future that brings equality and fairness. But that future will not come if we sit back and wait. It will only come if we act.

It will come if we show Scotland what we can do today, not just what we would do after independence.

We have hope in a better future, and the determination to act upon it now.

Address

Dyce
Aberdeen
AB21MMM

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Silver City Antiques posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Share

Category