09/24/2026
This.
I’ve seen versions of this conversation shared around Pottstown quite a bit lately, and I understand why. Vacant and neglected properties don’t just sit there quietly. They affect the businesses beside them, the people who live nearby, the people who own and maintain their properties, and the way a community sees itself.
I agree that there need to be both incentives for people who want to invest in their properties and meaningful consequences when properties are allowed to deteriorate indefinitely.
And selfishly, as someone who desperately wants to bring Curio No. 7 into Pottstown, I think about this a lot.
I want to be able to afford a space here.
I want to take a tired storefront and make people stop walking when they pass it. I want to create beautiful windows, restore and reuse things that deserve another life, fill a space with books and stories and carefully chosen objects, and create something that makes people curious about what is happening inside.
I believe the visual care we put into a property matters.
A beautiful, thoughtfully maintained storefront doesn't just benefit the person running the business. It contributes something to the block. It tells the people walking by that this place matters. It gives other people a reason to invest, too.
I want Curio No. 7 to be part of that kind of Pottstown.
I just need the opportunity to get through the door.
Vacant and blighted downtown property is extremely costly.
The people paying that cost are not the property owners. It's the adjacent business owners. The neighboring property owners. The residents and taxpayers.
Everyone pays except the people responsible.
So what do you actually do about it? All week people have been asking, so here are the tools that work.
On the incentive side: facade grants, historic tax credits, low interest renovation loans, gap financing, and density bonuses for upper floor development. These work for property owners who want to do the right thing but need help getting there.
On the consequences side: stepped up code enforcement with real teeth, minimum maintenance legislation that sets a floor for property condition, vacant property registries that track who owns what and hold them accountable, and demolition by neglect ordinances that make it illegal to let a building deteriorate to the point of collapse.
These aren't radical ideas. Thousands of communities across the country have implemented every one of them. The legal authority exists. The tools exist.
Responsible property owners who invest in their buildings should not be penalized by the negligence of others. That's not fairness. That's not how standards work.
Both tools exist. Use both.
*This is the work I do with communities across the country. If your town is ready for an honest conversation about its civic health, find me at revitalizeordie.com