Feeling Frameous Custom Picture Framing and Art

Feeling Frameous Custom Picture Framing and Art Custom picture framing and art. We have a large variety of high quality picture frame moulding. We frame for conservation, preservation and great design.

We frame all kinds of art and needlework.

03/08/2026
01/31/2026

Andrew Carnegie once made a promise to himself that shocked the wealthy elite of his era: "The man who dies thus rich dies disgraced."

He meant every word.

Born in 1835 in a tiny Scottish village, Carnegie grew up watching his father—a skilled weaver—lose everything as factory machines replaced human craftsmanship. His family was left with nothing, eventually selling their furniture just to afford passage to America.

At twelve years old, Carnegie began working in a Pittsburgh cotton factory. He earned $1.20 a week, laboring twelve hours a day, six days a week. But something happened on Saturday nights that would change the course of history.

A local businessman named Colonel James Anderson opened his personal library to working boys—free of charge. Carnegie walked in with nothing but curiosity, and he walked out with a dream.

"It was from my own early experience that I decided there was no use to which money could be applied so productive... as the founding of a public library," he later wrote.

Carnegie rose from factory boy to telegraph operator, and from railroad worker to steel magnate. By 1901, he had built an empire worth nearly half a billion dollars, making him the richest man on Earth.

Then, he stopped making money and started giving it away.

Over the next eighteen years, Carnegie funded the construction of 2,509 libraries across the globe. In America alone, he built 1,689 of them—in small towns, bustling cities, and everywhere in between. For many communities, it was the first time ordinary people could borrow a book without paying a fee.

He didn't care about having his name carved in stone; he wanted doors to be opened.

When Andrew Carnegie died in 1919, nearly half of all public libraries in America existed because of him. He had given away $350 million—over 90 percent of his entire fortune.

Every child who walks into a free public library today, pulls a book from the shelf, and discovers a world beyond their own circumstances is living proof of a man who believed knowledge should never be locked away from those who hunger for it.

Some build monuments to themselves. Andrew Carnegie built doorways for everyone else.

01/24/2026

She changed the lives of millions before anyone knew her son's name.
Before Ann Dunham became known as Barack Obama's mother, she was already extraordinary. In high school near Seattle, her classmates noticed something different about her. "Intellectually way more mature than we were," one remembered. "A little bit ahead of her time." Another friend called her "the original feminist."
While her peers worried about dating and fitting in, Ann questioned everything—gender roles, cultural assumptions, the very structure of society. She read beatnik poets and French existentialists. She challenged authority before it was celebrated. She believed women didn't need to follow anyone's script.
At 18, she gave birth to Barack. At 23, she'd already been married and divorced twice. But she refused to let her personal life define or limit her. She was a scholar first. A thinker. Someone determined to understand how the world really worked.
In 1967, she moved from Honolulu to Jakarta with her six-year-old son. There, in rural Indonesian villages, she began the research that would become her life's work. She studied blacksmithing, weaving, cottage industries—the economic life of people whose voices were rarely heard.
At the time, Western academics widely believed poverty in developing nations resulted from "cultural shortcomings"—that poor communities lacked intelligence, work ethic, or capability. Ann Dunham spent years proving them wrong. Through meticulous fieldwork, living in villages and listening to women everyone else ignored, she demonstrated a fundamental truth: rural poverty wasn't about lack of ability. It was about lack of access to resources.
Her research changed how development economics viewed entire regions of the Global South.
But she didn't stop at theory. Ann designed microfinance programs specifically for rural women—creating access to savings and small loans that allowed them to start businesses, support families, and gain financial independence. Women who'd been told they had nothing to offer built thriving enterprises because someone finally gave them the tools and believed in their capacity.
The programs she helped build with Bank Rakyat Indonesia eventually became the world's largest microfinance institution, lifting millions out of poverty.
Ann Dunham never sought fame. She didn't stand on stages or deliver speeches to packed auditoriums. She worked quietly—on dirt roads, in villages, listening to the people who needed to be heard most. She believed dignity begins with opportunity. And she spent her life proving it.
When she died in 1995 at age 52, most of the world had never heard her name. But the women in Indonesian villages knew her. The families who built businesses with her microloans knew her. The development workers who learned from her research knew her. Barack Obama knew her—and has said repeatedly that everything he values, he learned from his mother.
Before she raised a president, Ann Dunham changed how the world understands poverty, empowerment, and human potential. She proved that one person, working without fanfare, can create ripples that become waves.
She didn't just try to make the world more just.
She did.

12/13/2025

"I recommend this to every person, even before starting therapy" - Helen K. Registered Clinical Therapist.

12/02/2025
11/28/2025

The wolf does not touch the dead — not man, not beast — its honor stands above hunger.
It loves only once, for life; never crossing bloodlines, never betraying.
If its mate dies, it chooses solitude over replacement.
It knows its young, and when its parents grow frail with age, it returns — bringing food, bringing loyalty.
When you kill a wolf, it holds your gaze — no fear, no hatred — until its soul slips away.
Smarter than the cleverest dog by far, yet it cannot be tamed; no leash, no whip can command its spirit.
They say the wolf is the villain — But sometimes, what they call evil… is simply misunderstood.

11/12/2025

A man spent twenty minutes explaining her own book to her—and she was too polite to interrupt him.
That moment changed everything.
The year was 2008. Rebecca Solnit, already an acclaimed writer and historian, was at a party in Aspen when a wealthy older man asked what she'd been working on.
She mentioned she'd just published a book about Eadweard Muybridge, the photographer.
His face lit up. "Have you heard about the very important Muybridge book that came out this year?"
Before she could respond, he launched into an enthusiastic explanation of this groundbreaking work. How significant it was. How she really should read it. How it completely changed the understanding of—
Her friend tried to interject: "That's her book."
He kept talking.
"That's her book," her friend said again, louder.
He continued explaining, undeterred, certain in his authority.
It took three attempts before he finally stopped. And even then, he didn't apologize. He just deflated slightly and changed the subject.
Rebecca went home and wrote an essay about it.
She called it "Men Explain Things to Me."
And with that essay, she gave the world a word for something women had experienced forever but had no name for: mansplaining.
The Pattern Behind the Party
The essay wasn't really about one pompous man at one party. It was about a pattern Rebecca had noticed her entire life: men explaining things to women who already know them. Men speaking with unearned authority. Men assuming their knowledge is superior, even when confronted with evidence to the contrary.
She wrote: "Men explain things to me, still. And no man has ever apologized for explaining, wrongly, things that I know and they don't."
Women everywhere read that sentence and felt seen.
Within years, "mansplaining" entered the Oxford English Dictionary—though Rebecca never used that exact word. She'd simply described the phenomenon with such clarity that someone else had to name it.
But the essay revealed something deeper than just annoying male behavior. It exposed a system.
The Standards Nobody Questioned
Here's where Rebecca Solnit's brilliance really shows: she doesn't just point out individual bad actors. She reveals the architecture of inequality.
In her work, she writes what might be her most devastating observation: "Men invented standards they could meet and called them universal."
Stop and think about that.
History textbooks are called "History"—but they're mostly about men. So women's history becomes a subcategory, a special interest topic, while male history is just... history. The default. The universal.
Literature anthologies are called "Great Literature"—but they're filled with male authors. So women's writing becomes "women's literature," a subset, while male perspectives are presented as the human experience.
Philosophy is taught as universal human reasoning—but it was developed almost entirely by men. So women's ways of thinking get dismissed as emotional, subjective, irrational.
The "universal human experience" was actually just the male experience, rebranded and sold as neutral truth.
Rebecca asks: What if we stopped accepting that? What if we recognized that "objectivity" and "universal standards" were themselves gendered constructs designed to exclude women?
Everything changes.
Suddenly, the rules aren't natural or inevitable. They're just... choices. Choices made by people with power. And choices can be challenged.
When Silence Isn't Golden
Another pattern Rebecca dismantles: the idea that silence means peace.
We're taught that women who don't complain are content. That communities without protest are harmonious. That the absence of visible conflict means everything is fine.
But as Rebecca points out in her essay collection "The Mother of All Questions," silence often just means someone's voice has been successfully suppressed.
She examines the questions women are constantly asked: Why don't you have children? Why don't you smile more? Why are you so angry?
These aren't innocent curiosity. They're enforcement mechanisms—ways of policing women's choices, emotions, and existence.
And when women answer honestly, when they say "I don't want children" or "I have every right to be angry," they're treated as disruptive. As if they're creating conflict where none existed before.
But Rebecca reveals the truth: The conflict was always there. It was just invisible because one side had been silenced.
She writes: "The question isn't why are women angry. It's why aren't we angrier?"
The Personal Is Evidence
What makes Rebecca's work so powerful is that she refuses to separate her lived experience from intellectual analysis.
In her memoir "Recollections of My Nonexistence," she describes walking through San Francisco as a young woman, constantly aware of male violence. Catcalls that felt like threats. Strange men following her. The persistent feeling of being hunted in public space.
She describes being interrupted in conversations, dismissed in intellectual spaces, told her ideas weren't quite right by men who then repeated those same ideas minutes later to applause.
These aren't just personal grievances. They're data points.
Data proving that women navigate the world differently than men. That "public space" isn't equally public for everyone. That intellectual authority is gendered. That male violence structures women's daily existence in ways men never have to consider.
And here's her crucial insight: The man who interrupts a woman in a meeting and the man who commits violence against women aren't opposites. They're part of the same system—one that treats women's voices, bodies, and autonomy as less important than men's comfort.
The small dismissals and the large violence exist on a continuum. They're connected.
The Strategic Use of Calm
Here's what makes Rebecca Solnit devastatingly effective: she doesn't scream about injustice. She dissects it with surgical precision.
Her tone is measured, literary, often quietly cutting. She uses careful evidence and precise language. She doesn't rage; she reveals.
This is deliberate.
When women express anger, they're dismissed as hysterical, emotional, unreliable. But Rebecca's calm clarity makes her impossible to dismiss without revealing your own bias.
She writes: "Credibility is a basic survival tool." For women challenging male authority, being believed is a battle. So Rebecca arms herself with unshakeable logic and undeniable patterns.
Her restraint isn't weakness. It's tactical genius.
She makes inequality so obvious that arguing against her means admitting you benefit from it.
Hope as Resistance
Despite documenting violence, erasure, and systemic inequality, Rebecca's work isn't despairing. She's a chronicler of defiant hope.
In "Hope in the Dark," she writes: "Hope is not a lottery ticket you can sit on the sofa and clutch, feeling lucky. It is an axe you break down doors with in an emergency."
She documents feminist victories—laws changed, attitudes shifted, voices amplified—to prove that resistance works. That naming injustice is the first step to dismantling it.
She shows that "universal" rules can be challenged. That what was built can be rebuilt differently.
Her message: The system isn't natural. It was constructed. And construction can be undone.
Why She Matters
Rebecca Solnit has given us language for experiences we couldn't name.
Every time someone says "stop mansplaining," they're using vocabulary she helped create.
Every time someone questions whether a "universal" standard is actually universal, they're applying her framework.
Every time someone refuses to accept silence as peace, they're following her example.
She's shown us that feminism doesn't require rage to be effective. Sometimes the most powerful critique is delivered calmly, with precision and evidence that makes injustice impossible to deny.
She's proven that the personal is political—that individual experiences aren't isolated incidents but evidence of structural patterns.
And she's reminded us that hope isn't passive waiting. It's active work—the daily practice of refusing to accept that the way things are is the way things must be.
The man at that party in Aspen had no idea he was about to become famous. He thought he was just sharing important information with a woman who clearly needed his expertise.
Instead, he became an example. A perfect illustration of a pattern so pervasive that millions of women recognized it immediately.
Rebecca Solnit took that moment of being silenced and turned it into a voice that couldn't be ignored.
She gave us words for what we already knew.
And words, as she's proven, are where change begins.
Once you can name something, you can see it everywhere.
And once you see it everywhere, you can start to dismantle it.
That's not just writing.
That's revolution, one precise sentence at a time.

11/11/2025

When corporate clients canceled her contracts because she was "just a widow," she took everything she knew about factories and applied it to the one place men never looked: the kitchen.
And from there, she changed the world.
Her name was Lillian Moller Gilbreth. She had a PhD in psychology, twelve children, and a problem that would have destroyed most people:
Her husband had just died, taking their income with him. And nobody would hire a woman engineer—no matter how brilliant she was.
So she did what engineers do. She found another way.
The Girl Who Had to Fight for College
Lillian was born in 1878 in Oakland, California, the oldest of nine children. She was shy, bookish, more comfortable with ideas than people. But she was brilliant in a way that couldn't be hidden.
When she graduated high school at the top of her class, she wanted to go to college. Her father said no.
This was the 1890s. Nice girls from good families didn't need higher education. They needed husbands. College, her father believed, would only make Lillian unmarriageable—too smart, too independent, too threatening to potential suitors.
Lillian persisted. She argued. She pleaded. Finally, he relented.
In 1900, she graduated from UC Berkeley with a degree in English literature—and became the first woman ever permitted to speak at a University of California commencement ceremony.
That was just the first of many firsts.
She earned a master's degree. Then she met Frank Gilbreth—a construction contractor with no college degree but a mind that saw patterns everywhere. He looked at construction sites and saw wasted motion. He looked at brick-laying and saw inefficiency.
And he looked at Lillian and saw a partner who could match his intellectual ambition.
They married in 1904. And together, they invented a revolution.
The Science of Not Wasting Time
Frank and Lillian pioneered what became known as "time-and-motion studies"—a systematic approach to understanding work that transformed American industry.
The concept was deceptively simple: Film workers performing tasks. Analyze the footage frame by frame. Identify every wasted movement. Redesign the process to be faster, safer, and less exhausting.
They invented "therbligs" (Gilbreth spelled backwards)—a system of 17 fundamental motions that comprise all human work. Search. Select. Grasp. Transport. Position. Release.
They consulted for factories, hospitals, offices. Everyone wanted the Gilbreths' expertise.
But here's what made them different from other efficiency experts: Lillian brought psychology to engineering.
While Frank obsessively timed everything with a stopwatch, chasing speed and productivity, Lillian watched workers' faces. She asked questions no one else thought to ask:
Are they comfortable? Are they happy? How can we make this work less soul-crushing?
She believed efficiency and humanity weren't opposites—they enhanced each other. That good design should reduce suffering, not just increase output.
Publishers often refused to credit Lillian on their books, believing a female author would hurt credibility. But anyone who worked with them knew: she was Frank's equal. Often his superior.
And she was doing all of this while raising children. Lots of them.
The Gilbreths had twelve children—and turned their household into a living laboratory. They timed everything: washing dishes, brushing teeth, making beds. They experimented with workflows. They involved the children in testing new methods.
Two of those children would later write "Cheaper by the Dozen"—the bestselling memoir about growing up in a household where parents approached child-rearing like engineers solving a fascinating puzzle.
Then, in June 1924, everything fell apart.
The Day Everything Changed
Frank Gilbreth died suddenly of a heart attack. He was 55 years old.
Lillian was 46, with eleven children still at home. The youngest were still in school. The oldest was just 19.
Overnight, she lost her partner, her collaborator, her co-parent. And worse—she lost most of her income.
Corporate clients canceled their contracts immediately. They'd hired "the Gilbreths"—a team. Not a woman alone.
Despite Lillian's PhD. Despite her contributions being equal to or greater than Frank's. Despite years of proven expertise.
Companies simply refused to work with her.
Because she was a widow. A woman. And in 1924, women didn't do engineering.
She had eleven children to feed, clothe, and educate. No husband. No income. And a society that told her to give up, accept charity, maybe find a rich man to remarry.
Lillian Gilbreth refused.
But she was strategic. If industrial companies wouldn't hire her as an engineer, she'd pivot to a domain they thought women could legitimately understand:
Homes. Kitchens. The invisible, undervalued work that women did every single day.
Revolution in the Kitchen
Lillian took everything she'd learned studying factory workers and applied it to the place where most women spent their days—performing repetitive, exhausting labor that no one called "work" because it wasn't paid.
She began consulting for appliance manufacturers: General Electric, Macy's, Johnson & Johnson.
She interviewed over 4,000 women about how they actually used kitchens. What heights felt comfortable? Which movements caused pain? What tasks were unnecessarily difficult?
And she discovered something infuriating:
Kitchens were designed by men who never cooked, for women whose needs were never considered.
Counter heights were arbitrary—too high for some women, too low for others, causing chronic back pain. Appliances were positioned with no thought to workflow. Storage was inefficient. Everything required more steps, more effort, more strain than necessary.
So Lillian redesigned the American kitchen.
She developed the L-shaped kitchen layout—maximizing efficiency by minimizing the distance between sink, stove, and refrigerator. The "work triangle" concept that every kitchen designer still uses today.
She studied counter heights and recommended adjustable or varied heights for different tasks.
She invented shelves for refrigerator doors—including the egg keeper and butter tray we take for granted now. Before Lillian, refrigerator doors were blank. She saw wasted space.
She helped improve electric mixers, can openers, stoves—always asking: How can we make this easier for the person actually using it?
And she invented the foot-pedal trash can.
The Genius of the Garbage Can
Think about it: In the 1920s, trash cans had lids you lifted with your hands.
You're preparing raw chicken. Your hands are covered in salmonella. You need to throw something away. So you touch the trash can lid, contaminating it. Later, you touch it again with clean hands.
The foot-pedal design was brilliant in its simplicity: Open the trash can without using your hands. Prevent cross-contamination. Keep kitchens cleaner. Save time. Reduce disease.
In an era when indoor plumbing and modern sanitation were still luxuries, this small invention helped prevent illness and death.
It seems obvious now. That's how you know it's good design—it becomes invisible because we can't imagine it any other way.
But someone had to think of it first. And that someone was a widowed mother of twelve who refused to accept that women's work in the home deserved less engineering attention than men's work in factories.
The Comeback
In 1929, Lillian unveiled "Gilbreth's Kitchen Practical" at a Women's Exposition in New York—a fully designed, ergonomically efficient kitchen that became the template for modern kitchen design.
Her work caught attention. By the 1930s, Lillian Gilbreth had rebuilt her career entirely—on her own terms.
She became a consultant to major corporations. President Hoover appointed her to his Emergency Committee for Unemployment during the Depression, where she created a "Share the Work" program to generate jobs for thousands.
During World War II, she consulted for military bases and war plants, applying her efficiency methods to support the war effort.
In 1935, at age 57, she became the first female engineering professor at Purdue University. She held that position until she was 70.
And then she kept working anyway. She lectured at MIT into her 80s. She consulted. She wrote. She directed an international training center at NYU, designing kitchens specifically for people with disabilities.
Over her lifetime, she received over 20 honorary degrees and became:

First woman elected to the National Academy of Engineering (1965)
Second woman admitted to the American Society of Mechanical Engineers (1926)
First woman to receive the Hoover Medal (1966)—for "great, unselfish, non-technical services by engineers to humanity"

They called her "the mother of modern management" and "a genius in the art of living."
She lived to be 93 years old.
What She Taught Us
Here's what makes Lillian Gilbreth's story so powerful:
She succeeded in an era designed to stop her. She raised eleven children while earning a PhD and building a groundbreaking career. She lost her husband and her income—and refused to quit.
But more than that: she took the principles developed for factories—efficiency, workflow optimization, ergonomics—and used them to transform the invisible labor that women performed in homes.
She proved that women's work deserved the same engineering attention as men's work.
That efficiency could be humane. That good design reduces suffering. That making ordinary life easier for ordinary people is engineering's highest calling.
Every time you open your refrigerator and grab something from the door shelf, you're using Lillian Gilbreth's invention.
Every time you step on a pedal to open your trash can, you're benefiting from her insight.
Every time you work in a kitchen with an efficient layout—appliances positioned to minimize walking, counter heights designed for comfort—you're living in a world she helped create.
And yet, most people don't know her name.
They know "Cheaper by the Dozen"—the charming story of a quirky, loving family. But they don't know the woman behind it was a pioneering engineer who changed how we think about work, design, and human dignity.
They don't know she was told to quit and chose to rebuild instead.
They don't know she took rejection and turned it into revolution.
The Legacy
In 1984, twelve years after her death, the U.S. Postal Service issued a stamp in her honor.
But her real legacy isn't honors or awards. It's in every kitchen in America. Every ergonomic design. Every time someone asks: "How can we make this easier for the person using it?"
Lillian Gilbreth believed that design should serve people, not the other way around. That efficiency isn't just about speed—it's about preserving human energy for what actually matters.
That women's unpaid labor in homes deserved the same respect, the same analysis, the same engineering brilliance as any factory floor.
She had twelve children and a PhD in engineering.
When her husband died and the world told her to quit, she invented the foot-pedal trash can—and revolutionized how kitchens work.
Some people see problems.
Lillian Gilbreth saw possibilities—and turned them into systems that made life easier, cleaner, and more human for millions of people who never knew her name.
The next time you open your trash can with your foot, remember the widowed mother of twelve who refused to quit.
Who took rejection and built revolution.
Who proved that the best engineering doesn't just make things faster—it makes life more human.

11/06/2025
11/01/2025
10/09/2025

Address

Studio City, CA

Opening Hours

Tuesday 10am - 6pm
Wednesday 10am - 6pm
Thursday 10am - 6pm
Friday 10am - 6pm
Saturday 10am - 6pm

Telephone

+18185061339

Alerts

Be the first to know and let us send you an email when Feeling Frameous Custom Picture Framing and Art posts news and promotions. Your email address will not be used for any other purpose, and you can unsubscribe at any time.

Contact The Business

Send a message to Feeling Frameous Custom Picture Framing and Art:

Share

Category